Hystoric aspects of introduction of transbladder and retropubic simple prostatectomy in surgical urological practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8127.2022.66.7Keywords:
benign prostatic hyperplasia, transbladder and retropubic simple prostatectomy, steps of introduction, methods of hemostasis of prostatic bed.Abstract
The article presents the main stages of transvesical and retropubic prostatectomies on benign prostatic hyperplasia in hystorical aspects, beginning from open intervention to minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic techniques. The development of hemostatic methods during the transvesical and retropubic prostatectomies are highlighted, in particular by Ukrainian urologists. The aim of the study is to present the main stages of transvesical and retropubic prostatectomies in the surgical urological practice according to the literary data. Research methodology and methods. Literature sources were searched using the Medline database from PubMed and Google Scholar using the phrases “open simple transbladder and retropubic prostatectomy”, “hemostasis for open simple transbladder and retropubic prostatectomy”. Presentation of the main research material. According to the obtained data in scientific databases, it becomes clear that the problem of prostate bed hemostasis during transvesical and retropubic prostatectomies in the world was and remains quite relevant. Although interest in a laser enucleation and laparoscopic prostatectomies for the large hyperplastic prostate nodes (more than 80 ml) continues to grow in the world, open transvesical and retropubic prostatectomies are also widely used today. Therefore, individual stages of these operations, which are improved over time, deserve the special attention in order to reduce the risks of complications and improve the results of treatment. Conclusions. Transvesical and retropubic prostatectomies in benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery count more than 125 years of development and improving. These interventions have passed through the period from open intervention to the minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic techniques in Ukraine and in the world, but even today the choice of the best option for prostatectomy remains with the operating urologist.
References
Kulis T, Hudolin T, Penezic L, et al. Comparison of extraperitoneal laparoscopic and extraperitoneal Senhance radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robot. 2022;18(1):e2344. doi:10.1002/rcs.2344
Manfredi M, Fiori C, Peretti D, et al. Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: complications and functional results after five years of follow-up. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020;72(4):498-504. doi:10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03526-4
Gorovyi VI, Shaprynskyi VO, Chaika HV, Baralo IV, & Kapshuk OM. (2018). Urgent urology in the practice of surgical doctors: textbook [Urgent urology in the practice of surgical doctors: Textbook. manual]. Vinnytsia: TOV "TVORY". 824. [In Ukrainian]Vozianov AF, Pasechnikov SP, Klimenko YN, Gritsai VS. Open prostatectomy in the surgical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia. Men’s Health. 2008;1:196-199. [In Russian].
Manickam R, Nachimuthu S, Kallappan S, Pai MG. Laparoscopic adenomectomy in BPH – Does it have a role today? Asian J Urol. 2018;5(1):37-41. doi:10.1016/j.ajur.2017.11.008
Atwood EF. Eugene Fuller, M.D. (1858-1930). Urology. 1973;2(3):325-330. doi:10.1016/0090-4295(73)90478-0
Crane GM, Bloom DA. Ramon Guiteras: founder of the American Urological Association, surgeon, sportsmen and statesmen. J. Urol. 2010;184:447–452.
Gorovyi VI, Shaprynskyi VO, Baralo IV, & Kapshuk OM (2021). Retropubic prostatectomy in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a textbook [Retropubic prostatectomy in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a textbook]. Vinnytsia: TOV "TVORY" – Vinnytsia: TOV "TVORY". 336. [In Ukrainian].
Tubaro A, Nunzio C. The current role of open surgery in BPH. EAU-EBU update series. 2006;4:191-201.
Lower WE. Complete closure of the bladder following prostatectomy; preliminary report. J A M A. 1927;89:749–751.
Murphy LJ. Harry Harris and his contribution to suprapubic prostatectomy. Aust N Z J Surg. 1984;54(6):579-588. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.1984.tb05451.x
Karpenko VS, Bogatov OP. Surgery of prostate adenoma. Kiev: Zdorovya. 1981;188. [In Russian].
Stakhovsky EO, Vitruk YV. Technique of "ideal" prostatectomy. Clinical Oncology. (Special Issue I). 2013;56–58. [In Ukrainian].
Smith J. A. et al. Hinmann’s atlas of urological surgery. E Saunders. 2018;968.
Gelfer PI, Blatnoy HP. Modification of simultaneous adenomectomy of the prostate with a blind suture of the bladder. Urology. 1959;4:33-36. [In Russian].
Van Stockum WJ. Prostatectomia suprapubica extravesical. Zentralbl. f. Chir. 1909;36(2):41–43.
Millin T. Retropubic prostatectomy; a new extravesical technique; report of 20 cases. Lancet. 1945;2(6380):693-696. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(45)91030-0
Pivovarov PI, Gursky BF, Maksimov VD, Gorovoy VI. Methodology of hemostasis in extra-bladder behind-pubic adenomectomy. Urol. and nephrol. 1991;2:37-41. [In Russian].
Sernyak PS, Vinentsov YA, Shamraev SN. Surgical treatment of patients with prostate adenoma. Modern methods of treatment of prostate adenoma: Proceedings of the Conf. Scientific Society of Urologists of Ukraine. Kiev. 1997;85-87. [In Russian].
Sernyak PS, Vinentsov YA, Shamraev SN, Kobets VG. Modification of the back pubic prostate adenomectomy. Prostate adenoma: Materials of the V International Congress of Urologists. Edited by Prof. A.S. Pereverzeva. Kharkiv: Fact. 1997;164-167. [In Russian].
Shamraev SN, Sernyak PS, Vinentsov YA and others. Retropubic prostatectomy – a look into the past. Man’s health. 2013;4:178-179. [In Russian].
Mariano MB, Graziottin TM, Tefilli MV. Laparoscopic prostatectomy with vascular control for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2002;167(6):2528-2529.
Sotelo R, Clavijo R, Carmona O, et al. Robotic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;179(2):513-515. doi:10.1016/j. juro.2007.09.065
Campbell-Walsh. Urology. Wein A.J. et al. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2016;4904.
Ferretti M, Phillips J. Prostatectomy for benign prostate disease: open, laparoscopic and robotic techniques. Can J Urol. 2015;22 Suppl 1:60-66.
Porpiglia F, Terrone C, Renard J, et al. Transcapsular adenomectomy(Millin): a comparative study, extraperitoneal laparoscopy versus open surgery. Eur Urol. 2006;49(1):120-126. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.017
Noguera RS, Rodríguez RC. Open adenomectomy: past, present and future. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18(1):34-40. doi:10.1097/ MOU.0b013e3282f0d625
Gravas S., Cornu N., Gacci M. et al. EAU Guidelines on management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), incl. benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). EAU. 2021;68.
Zargooshi J. Open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: short-term outcome in 3000 consecutive patients. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases. 2007;10: 374 – 377.
Vozianov AF, Pasechnikov SP, Klimenko YN, Gritsai VS. Open prostatectomy in the surgical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia. Men’s Health. 2008;1:196-199. [In Russian].
Pereverzev AS. Will urologists retain open adenomectomy in the arsenal of treatment. Men’s Health. 2009;4:230-234. [In Russian].
Saydakova NO, etc. The main indicators of urological care in Ukraine for 2015-2016 (departmental edition). Kyiv, 2017;190. [In Ukrainian].
Saidakova NO, Stus VP, Dmytryshyn SP, etc. Epidemiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Ukraine. Urology. 2018;3:5-12. [In Ukrainian].
