Cerebral venous hemodynamics and venous blood flow reactivity in patients with migraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8127.2022.66.12Keywords:
venous blood flow, transcranial duplex scanning, cerebrovascular reactivity, migraine.Abstract
Introduction. Headache is currently one of the most common complaints in various pathological conditions. At the present level, the use of transcranial duplex scanning (TDS) in the diagnosis of various types of headache is relevant. Recently, a sufficiently large number of works have been published on the study of cerebral hemodynamic disorders in patients with migraine with and without aura, in the interictal period and during an attack. The ample data support the vascular hypothesis of migraine pathogenesis. Studies of venous cerebral hemodynamics have also been conducted in patients with migraine. The relationship between the severity of venous disorders and the state of vascular tone was revealed. Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is considered as an integral indicator of the adaptive capabilities of the cerebral circulatory system. The use of TDS to assess CVR is informative in patients with migraine. The aim of the study was to assess the state of the cerebral venous hemodynamics and regulation cerebral venous blood flow in patients with migraine. Materials and methods. We performed clinical Doppler examination of 124 young patients (55 men, 69 women) with migraine without aura (group 1 – 63 patients), migraine with aura (group 2 – 61 patients). The TDS method was used to study indicators maximum linear speed blood flow (Vmax) in the supraocular (SOV) and vertebral (VV) veins, basal veins of Rosenthal (BV), direct sinus (DS), as well as reactivity coefficients in DS and BV using hypercapnic, orthostatic, antiorthostatic loads. Results. Patients of the 1st group were characterized by hyporeactivity in DS and BV to hypercapnic load, as a sign of primary venous angiodystonia. Also hyperreactivity of these patients to antiorthostatic load in PS and BV was revealed, as an indicator of dysfunction of the neurogenic regulation circuit. The patients of the 2nd group showed a combined hyperreactivity in DS and BV to hypercapnic and antiorthostatic loads, as a sign of dysfunction of the neurogenic circuit of vascular regulation. Conclusions. Cerebral venous hemodynamic changes in patients with migraine in the interictal period are manifested as disorders of cerebral venous blood flow in the superocular veins, basal veins of Rosenthal and direct sinus, more pronounced in the migraine with aura group. Patients with migraine without aura are characterized by hyporeactivity in DS and BV to hypercapnic load and hyperreactivity to antiorthostatic load in PS and BV. In patients with migraine with aura, hyperreactivity in PS and BV to hypercapnic and antiorthostatic loads is observed. The use of Doppler study of cerebral venous hemodynamics and reactivity of venous cerebral blood flow makes it possible to clarify the pathogenetic mechanisms of a migraine attack and helps to optimize the treatment of patients with migraine, taking into account the state of cerebral vascular regulation.
References
Altamura C, Paolucci M, Brunell N, Rizzo AC, Cecchi G, Assenza F, Silvestrini, M, Vernieri F. Right-to-Left Shunts and Hormonal Therapy Influence Cerebral Vasomotor Reactivity in Patients with Migraine with Aura. PLoS ONE. 2019; 14: e0220637.
Dodick DW. A Phase-by-Phase Review of Migraine Pathophysiology. Headache J. Head Face Pain. 2018; 58: 4–16.
Gadda A, Taibi F, Sisini M, Gambaccini P. Zamboni G, Ursino M. A new hemodynamic model for the study of cerebral venous outflow. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015:308: H217–H231, doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00469.2014.0363-6135/15
Hansen JM, Schankin CJ. Cerebral hemodynamics in the different phases of migraine and cluster headache. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019;39(4):595–609
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders. – 3rd edition. Cephalgia. 2018; 38(1):P. 1-211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738220
Jacobs B, Dussor G. Neurovascular contributions to migraine: moving beyond vasodilation. Neuroscience. 2016;338: 130–144. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.06.01202
Kalashnikov VI, Stoyanov AN, Pulyk OR, Bakumenko IK, Skorobrekha VZ. Features of cerebrovascular raectivity in patients of young age with migraine. Wiad Lek. 2020;73(11):2443-2446.PMID: 33454681
Karacay Ozkalayci S, Nazliel B, Batur Caglayan HZ, Irkec C. Cerebral bloodd flow velocity in migraine and chronic tensiontype headache patients. J Pain Res. 2018;11:661-666. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S144183
Lee MJ, Park BY, Cho S, Park H, Chung CS. Cerebrovascular Reactivity as a Determinant of Deep White MatterHyperintensities in Migraine. Neurology. 2019; 92: E342–E350
Magalhães JE, Rocha-Filho PAS. Migraine and Cerebrovascular Diseases: Epidemiology, Pathophysiological, and Clinical Considerations. Headache J. Head Face Pain. 2018; 58: 1277–1286.
Mahmoud AN, Mentias A, Elgendy AY, Qazi A, Barakat AF, Saad M, et al. Migraine and the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events: a meta-analysis of 16 cohort studies including 1 152 407 subjects. BMJ;2018: Open 8:e020498. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020498 12. Mason BN, Russo AF. Vascular Contributions to Migraine: Time to Revisit? Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018; 12:233. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00233
Öztürk B, Karadaş Ömer. Cerebral Hemodynamic Changes During Migraine Attacks and After Triptan Treatments. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2020 Sep; 57(3): 192–196. doi: 10.29399/npa.21650
Petolicchio B, Viganò A, Di Biase L, Tatulli D, Toscano M, Vicenzini E, Passarelli F, Di Piero Vittorio. Cerebral venous hemodynamic abnormalities in episodic and chronic migraine. Funct Neurol. 2016 Apr-Jun; 31(2): 81–86.doi: 10.11138/ FNeur/2016.31.2.081
Verma R, Mahapatro S, More A. Cerebral venous thrombosis associated with Migraine. Clin Case Rep. 2018; Rev 4: DOI: 10.15761/CCRR.100039
Visočnik D, Zaletel M, Žvan B, Zupan M. Enhanced Hemodynamic and Clinical Response to αCGRP in Migraine Patients-A TCD Study. Front. Neurol. 2021:12:638903. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.638903