Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children and adolescents: current views on diagnosis and treatment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8127.2024.69.1

Keywords:

humerus, supracondylar fractures, children, adolescents, diagnosis, treatment

Abstract

Fractures of the distal epimetaphysis of the humerus in children and adolescents are one of the most common injuries, accounting for 16 to 50% of bone fractures in general and 50–80% of all intra-articular injuries of the upper extremity. Among the injuries of this location, supracondylar (3–18%) and interspinous fractures (57.5–70%) prevail, mainly in children aged 5 to 9 years. Unsatisfactory treatment results range from 6.67% to 18.2%. The purpose of the study: to determine the modern principles of treatment of supra- and transdiscal fractures in children and adolescents, problematic issues and promising ways to solve them. Material and Methods. The literature was analysed using the Pubmed, Up-to-date, Scopus, Web of Science, MedLine, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Global Health databases using the search terms: supra- and transdigital fractures in children and adolescents, diagnosis and treatment. Results and their discussion. In supracondylar fractures, the most common are neurovascular complications (damage to the brachial artery, median or radial nerves), which are more common in Gartland III fractures. The relative incidence of nerve damage after supracondylar humerus fractures is 12–20%, including 2–6.5% of iatrogenic origin, which occurs during closed reduction and percutaneous fixation. Vascular lesions associated with fractures of the distal metaepiphysis of the humerus occur in 3.2–14.3%. An important debatable issue is the methods of fixation of fragments after closed and open reduction. To date, there are two most common configurations for fixation of supracondylar fractures in children and adolescents: a crossed pinning design (the most common) and a design using 2 or 3 lateral pins with their divergence in the coronal plane. Conclusions. 1. Supracondylar fractures are one of the most common injuries of the distal end of the humerus, more common in boys aged 4 to 9 years (58.3% of cases). A significant proportion of neurovascular complications in these fractures against the background of the peculiarities of children and adolescents in terms of subjective sensations requires a targeted study during the initial examination. 2. Deepening of knowledge through anatomical and biomechanical studies of the characteristics of structures with crossed and coronal use of fixation elements will improve the existing ones and will become the basis for the development of new fixation devices, which will significantly improve the results of treatment of supracondylar fractures in children and adolescents.

References

Heffernan M. J., Lucak T., Igbokwe Аrgiulo et al. The reverse oblique supracondylar humerus fracture: description of a novel fracture pattern. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2020. 40(2). Р. 131–137.

Segundo-Primero, G., Casas-López, M., Ruiz-Mejía. O. Surgical treatment of supracondylar fractures in pediatric patients using AO external lateral fixation technique. Acta ortopédica Mexicana. 2020. 34(3). Р. 195–199.

Martínez J. A., Almero L. P., De Anda R. C. O. et al. Epidemiological study on supracondylar fractures of distal humerus in pediatric patients. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition). 2019. 63(6). Р. 394–399. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Sep 11.

Bekmez S., Camp M. W., Ling R. et al. Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Older Children: Success of Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2021. 41(4). Р. 242–248. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001732.

Hu X., Zhong M., Lou Y. et al. Clinical application of individualized 3D- printed navigation template to children with cubitus varus deformity. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research.2020.15(1). Р. 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01615-8

Jerome J. T. J., Prabu G. R. Median nerve injuries associated with humerus shaft fractures in children. Orthoplastic Surgery. 2021. № 3. Р. 17–25. http;//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orthop.2020.11.003

Salvati S., Settembrini A. M., Bissacco, D. et al. Vascular Injury Due to Humerus Fracture in Pediatric Age: When the Treatment Is Mandatory. Annals of vascular surgery. 2017. 44. Р. 420–431. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.03.184.

Huriev S. O., Trutiak I. R., Obaranets O. V. Stan problemy perelomiv dystalnoho metaepifizu plechovoi kistky u ditei ta pidlitkiv. Visnyk Vinnytskoho natsionalnoho medychnoho universytetu. 2021. T. 25. № 2. s. 277–280. doi: 10.31393/reportsvnmedical-2021-25(2)-16

Ducic S., Stojanovic B., Lazovic M. et al. T-condylar humerus fracture in children: treatment options and outcomes. International Orthopaedics. 2021). 45(4). Р. 1065–1070 doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04827-z.

Ardawatia G., Waghela A. B. Ranade A. S. Intraoperative Kirschner Wire Breakage in a Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture. Cureus. 2021. 13(3). Р. 137–159.

Harris L. R., Arkader A., Broom A. Pulseless supracondylar humerus fracture with anterior interosseous nerve or median nerve injury – an absolute indication for open reduction? Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2019. 39(1). Р. 1–7.

Afaque S. F., Singh A., Maharjan R. et al. Comparison of clinic-radiological outcome of cross pinning versus lateral pinning for displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus in children: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma. 2020.11(2). Р. 259–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.01.013.

Fujiwara T., Yazaki N., Ogura A. et al. A case of radial nerve paralysis associated with supracondylar fracture of the humerus in a child. JSES Reviews,Reports&Techniques, 2021.1(4). Р. 469–472. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.06.003

George S. C., Burahee A. S., Sanders A. D. et al. Outcomes of anterior interosseous nerve transfer to restore intrinsic muscle function after high ulnar nerve injury. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic. 2021.75(2). Р. 703–710. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.072.

Chikande J., Rampal V., Sadaghianloo N. et al. Pseudoaneurysm of the brachial artery after reduction and fixation of a displaced supracondylar elbow fracture in a child. Annals of vascular surgery. 2019. 56. Р. 352–359. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.07.072.

Kitta M. I., Ariandi M., Nugroho Y. A. et al. Neurological recovery across a 2-cm gap of radial nerve repair using end to end suture following supracondylar humerus fracture: Case report. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2021. 82. Р. 105–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.105896.

Montanari S., Sartore R., Spina V. et al. Post-traumatic entrapment of the median nerve in the ulno-humeral joint: Diagnosis, treatment and literature review. Journal of Orthopaedic Science.2021.27(3). Р. 627–634. doi:10.1016/j.jos.2021.02. 006

Douglas G Armstrong , Kevin Monahan, Erik B Lehman at al. Pediatric Open Supracondylar Fracture: Associated Injuries and Surgical Management. J Pediatr Orthop. 2021. 41(4). Р. 342–346. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001772

Douglas G Armstrong , Rhett MacNeille, Erik B Lehman at al. Compartment Syndrome in Children With a Supracondylar Fracture: Not Everyone has Risk Factors. J OrthopTrauma. 2021. 35(8). Р. 298–303. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002030

Li X. T., Shen X. T., Wu X. at al. A novel transverse ultrasonography technique for minimally displaced lateral humeral condyle fractures in children. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2019. 105(3). Р. 557–562. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.02.005.

Dirk Walther Sommerfeldt, Peter Paul Schmittenbecher. Failure analysis and recommendations for treatment of posttraumaticnon-unions of the distal humerus during childhood. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021.16. Published online 2021 Jun 19. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02536-w.

Na Y, Bai R, Zhao Z. et al. Comparison of lateral entry with crossed entry pinning for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018.13. Р. 68–73.

Alexander M. Bitzer, Stephen M. Belkoff, Christa L. LiBrizzi at al. Sagittal plane alignment affects the strength of pin fixation in supracondylar humerus fractures. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jun 4; 100(22). e26173. Published online 2021 Jun 4. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026173.

Stephen M. Belkoff, Christa L. LiBrizzi., Chimelie Chibututu at al. Sagittal plane alignment affects the strength of pin fixation in supracondylar humerus fractures.Medicine (Baltimore). 2021. Jun 4; 100(22): e26173. Published online. 2021. Jun 4. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026173.

Gottschalk Hilton Phillip, Sagoo Daljeet, Glaser Diana at al. Biomechanical Analysis of Pin Placement for Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures Does Starting Point, Pin Size, and Number Matter?. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2012; 32(5): 445–451. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318257d1cd.

Srikumaran U., Tan E.W., Erkula G. at al. Pin size influences sagittal alignment in percutaneously pinned pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30:792-798. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181f6d3af.

Published

2024-05-16

How to Cite

Бурʼянов, О. А., Науменко, В. О., Кваша, В. П., Ковальчук, Д. Ю., Канзюба, А. І., & Федоренко, Д. І. (2024). Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children and adolescents: current views on diagnosis and treatment. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod University. Series «Medicine», (1(69), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8127.2024.69.1

Issue

Section

GENERAL SURGERY (ALL SURGICAL DISCIPLINES)