Anatomical variability of superficial veins of the lower limb in human fetuses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8127.2022.66.23Keywords:
great saphenous vein, small saphenous vein, anatomical variability, fetus, human.Abstract
Background. Modern minimally invasive methods have radically changed the clinical landscape of varicose vein surgery and shortened recovery time after surgery. All these changes became possible thanks to the constant deepening of knowledge about the topographical and anatomical features of the great and small saphenous veins in different periods of human ontogenesis. Objective is to find out the topographical and anatomical relationships of the great and small saphenous veins in human fetuses of 4-8 months. Methods. The research was carried out on preparations of the lower extremities of 26 human fetuses of 81.0-310.0 mm parietal-coccygeal length (PCL) without external signs of anatomical deviations or anomalies in the development of bone, fascial-muscular, and vascular-nervous structures of the lower extremities using macromicroscopic preparation, injection of vessels and morphometry. Results. In human fetuses of 4-8 months, the great saphenous vein passes directly under the fascia of the lower leg, partly in the subcutaneous tissue, since the formation of the latter is continuing at this stage of ontogenesis. In the majority of the examined fetuses, a classical version of the topography of the great and small saphenous veins of the right and left lower limbs was observed. In some cases, variability in the number of inflows of superficial veins, additional saphenous veins, and various anastomoses between additional and great and small saphenous veins was revealed. The most interesting, from our point of view, were the anatomical variants of the superficial veins of the lower limb in fetuses of 180.0, 195.0, 220.0, and 265.0 mm PCL. Conclusions. In the fetal stage of human ontogenesis, the anatomical variability of the superficial veins of the lower limbs was established, which is characterized by the variability of the shape, topography, and bilateral asymmetry of the inflows of the great and small saphenous veins and the formation of venous anastomoses. In one case, a left anterior additional saphenous vein was detected, and in two fetuses, a left posterior additional saphenous vein was detected. The coincidence of the topography of the subcutaneous veins of the right and left lower extremities was noted in 87.5% of the fetuses. Significant gender differences in the topography of the large and small subcutaneous veins in human fetuses were not found. The revealed variants of the fetal topography of the great and small saphenous veins are important for the correct interpretation of phlebographic research data and the individual strategy of the most rational method of surgical intervention.
References
Caggiati A, Bergan JJ. The saphenous vein: derivation of its name and its relevant anatomy. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(1):172-5. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.118826
Caggiati A, Bergan JJ, Gloviczki P, Jantet G, Wendell-Smith CP, Partsch H. Nomenclature of the veins of the lower limbs: an international interdisciplinary consensus statement. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(2):416-22. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.125847
Campbell B. The saphenous veins--great and small or long and short? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;32(6):744-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.08.003
Packiriswamy V, Nayak SB. Saphenous Ladder Formed by Almost Completely Duplicated Great Saphenous Vein. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2020;18(69):99-101.
Cirocchi R, Henry BM, Rambotti M, Tomaszewski KA, Cappelli M, Vettorello G, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the anatomic variants of the saphenofemoral junction. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019;7(1):128-38. doi: 10.1016/j. jvsv.2018.06.006 6. Maruyama Y, Imura H, Nitta T. Saphenous vein characteristics evaluated using three-dimensional contrastless computed tomography before coronary artery bypass grafting. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;69(3):444-50. doi: 10.1007/ s11748-020-01457-5
Kockaert M, de Roos KP, van Dijk L, Nijsten T, Neumann M. Duplication of the great saphenous vein: a definition problem and implications for therapy. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(1):77-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02154.x
Sokol VK, Sokol KM, Kolesnichenko VA. Features of mechanical injuries of the lower extremities according to a forensic medical examination: a retrospective analysis. Wiad Lek. 2020;73(6):1189-93. doi: 10.36740/WLek202006121
Ignatiadis IA, Mavrogenis AF, Igoumenou VG, Polyzois VD, Tsiampa VA, Arapoglou DK, et al. Gunshot and blast injuries of the extremities: a review of 45 cases. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29(2):295-305. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2350-4
van den Bremer J, Moll FL. Historical overview of varicose vein surgery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010;24(3):426-32. doi: 10.1016/j. avsg.2009.07.035
Kurobe N, Hakkakian L, Chahim M, Delmas V, Vekemans M, Uhl JF. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the lower limb’s venous system in human fetuses using the computer-assisted anatomical dissection (CAAD) technique. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37(3):231-8. doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1350-2
Khmara TV, Hryhorieva PV, Ryznychuk MA, Drachuk VM, Stelmakh GYa. Fetal variant anatomy of great saphenous vein. Archives of the Balkan Medical Union. 2020;55(2):206-14. doi: 10.31688/ABMU.2020.55.2.01