Homogeneous patient groups as an advanced system for standardizing inpatient care billing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24144/2415-8127.2019.60.78-82Keywords:
financing, homogeneous patient groups, OGP, DRG, reimbursement, inpatient care.Abstract
Health-care financing, which is based on hospitalization cases of homogeneous patient groups, has gradually be-come the primary means of reimbursement of costs of acute inpatient care in most high-income countries in the world since the 1990s. The motives that underlie the development and implementation of homogeneous patient groups sys-tems in different countries differ, but they mainly relate to increasing the transparency and efficiency of treatment in health care institutions and to optimizing their management. The purpose of the survey was to study and interpret the case mix approach to the classification of patient hospital-ization cases in order to optimize a unified pricing system for hospital services, variations of which have been imple-mented in the variety of developed countries. The modern scientific literature, which addresses the issue of identifying groups, the prerequisites and the standards for their creation, was analyzed and interpreted for the Ukrainian reader. The content analysis, the systematic and comparative analysis, as well as the bibliosemantic method were used. The main part of the article describes the definition of homogeneous patient groups and the system of mandatory attributes that they must possess, outlines the common causes and stages of implementation of homogeneous patient groups in national health-care systems, as well as the general differences in the methods of calculating the actual rate of payment for the patient hospitalization case. It is noted that the countries in which national classification systems are implemented may vary greatly in the number of groups. Other studies show that in most European countries the number of groups increases over time after their implemen-tation. Thus, between 2005-2011, the number of groups in Germany increased 1.36 times, in England more than dou-bled, and in France quadrupled. The overall implication of this cost-reimbursement model in Europe increased the activity of health-care facilities and the national expenditure on health care, and, conversely, the use of homogeneous patient groups in the United States restrained the country’s expenditure on the industry. Clinicians and national health-care authorities in Ukraine are advised to consider the introduction of homogeneous patient groups and to examine the approaches of other countries to classifying and calculating the actual rate of hospitalization case to create a modern and effective national model of inpatient care cost-reimbursement in Ukraine.
References
Mathauer I, Wittenbecher F. DRG-based payment systems in low- and middle-income countries: Im-plementation experiences and challenges. World Health Organization; 2012. Report No.: HSS/HSF/DP. E. 10.2.. 55 p.
Paris V, Devaux M, Wei L. Health institutional characteristics: a survey of 29 OECD countries. OECD Health Work Pap. 2010;(50).
Scheller-Kreinsen D, Geissler A, Busse R. The ABC of DRGs. Euro Obs. 2009;11(4):1–5.
Slabkiy GO, Rogach IM, Smirnov MM, Zhornyk VV. Financing model of healthcare institutions based on the example of France within the T2A system. Economy and Legislation of Health Care. 2018;(2 (8)):59–63. [in Ukrainian]
Fetter RB, Shin Y, Freeman JL, Averill RF, work(s): JDTR. Case Mix Definition by Diagnosis-Related Groups. Med Care. 1980;18(2,):1–53.
Busse R, Geissler A, Aaviksoo A, Cots F, Hakkinen U, Kobel C, et al. Diagnosis related groups in Eu-rope: moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals? BMJ. 2013 Jun 7;346:f3197–f3197.
Rogach IM, Smirnov MM, Keretsman AO, Zhornyk VV. Characteristics of the usage of a bed fund for inpatient treatment of adults with diseases of the nervous system in the Transcarpathian region. Ukraine. Health of Nation. 2018;(1 (47)):83–9. [in Ukrainian]
Rogach IM, Smirnov MM, Zhornyk VV. Epidemiology of neurological disorders in the Transcarpathi-an region in 2017. Art of Medicine. 2019;(2 (10)):93–7. [in Ukrainian]
Avksenteva MV, Salahutdinova SK. Kliniko-statisticheskie gruppyi (KSG) kak novyiy metod oplatyi statsionarnoy i statsionarozameschayuschey pomoschi v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Lekarstvennyiy Vestnik. 2016;10(2):31–6. [in Russian]
Busse R, Geissler A, Quentin W, Wiley M. Diagnosis-related Groups in Europe: Moving Towards Transparency, Efficiency and Quality in Hospitals. Open University Press; 2011. 490 p.
Moisdon J-C. Une histoire de la T2A. J Gest Déconomie Médicales. 2013;31(2):107.
Farrar S, Yi D, Sutton M, Chalkley M, Sussex J, Scott A. Has payment by results affected the way that English hospitals provide care? Difference-in-differences analysis. BMJ. 2009 Aug 27;339(aug27 2):b3047–b3047.
Lehtonen T. DRG-based prospective pricing and case-mix accounting–Exploring the mechanisms of successful implementation. Manag Account Res. 2007 Sep;18(3):367–95.
Peltola M, Quentin W. Diagnosis-Related Groups for Stroke in Europe: Patient Classification and Hospital Reimbursement in 11 Countries. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(2):113–23.
Lave JR. The effect of the Medicare prospective payment system. Annu Rev Public Health. 1989;10(1):141–61.