Multidisciplinary approach to the comprehensive rehabilitation of individuals with low vision
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8127.2025.72.23Keywords:
low vision; low-vision rehabilitation; multidisciplinary approach; interprofessional team; extended/augmented reality (XR); socially assistive robotics; functional visual ability; fall prevention; telerehabilitationAbstract
The article highlights current aspects of the rehabilitation of people with partial vision loss. The aim is to substantiate the effectiveness and practical feasibility of a multidisciplinary approach to the comprehensive rehabilitation of individuals with low vision and to propose a target model for integrating low-vision services into ophthalmic care pathways. A narrative review of randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, clinical guidelines and international standards was conducted, alongside a critical analysis of contemporary technological solutions (socially assistive robotics, XR, AI-based applications). It is demonstrated that low-vision rehabilitation programmes reliably improve quality of life, functional visual ability, reading and mobility; embedding psychoeducational and psychotherapeutic modules reduces depressive symptoms and caregiver burden, while specialized orientation-and-mobility interventions lower fall risk and strengthen autonomy. XR tools, socially assistive robots and computer-vision systems show high potential for navigation, visual enhancement and selfcare, yet they require large-scale, real-world trials with patient-centred endpoints and economic evaluation. The proposed model comprises an interprofessional team (ophthalmologist/optometrist, low-vision therapist, occupational therapist, orientation-and-mobility specialist, visionrehabilitation teacher, psychologist/social worker, IT specialist in assistive technologies), a standard pathway of “early detection → functional assessment → individualized plan → training-based behavioural programme with a controlled ‘dose’ of practice → outcome monitoring”, and mandatory inclusion of fall prevention and access to assistive technologies. The authors conclude that multidisciplinary rehabilitation is evidence-based and effective; maximal impact is achieved with early initiation, seamless coordination across levels of care, sufficient intensity of training components and systematic outcome measurement. Priorities for further research include paediatrics, telerehabilitation and the cost-effectiveness of services.
References
Sotnikova KK, Fedorova OV. Problema psykhosotsialnoi adaptatsii liudei z vadamy zoru v suchasnii Ukraini. Teoretychni i prykladni problemy psykholohii. 2019;(2):311-20. [in Ukrainian]
World Health Organization. Requirements in rehabilitation services in the European region WHO. Geneva: WHO; 2022. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/365126/9789289058650-rus.pdf
Ajuebor O, Boniol M, McIsaac M, Onyedike C, Akl EA. Increasing access to health workers in rural and remote areas: what do stakeholders value and find feasible and acceptable? Hum Resour Health. 2020;18(1):77. doi:10.1186/s12960-020-00519-2
Darzi AJ, Officer A, Abualghaib O, Akl EA. Stakeholders' perceptions of rehabilitation services for individuals living with disability: a survey study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14:2. doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0406-x
Stelmack JA, Tang XC, Reda DJ, Rinne S, Mancil RM, Massof RW; LOVIT Study Group. Outcomes of the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT). Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(5):608-17. doi:10.1001/archopht.126.5.608
Stelmack JA, Tang XC, Wei Y, Wilcox DT, Morand T, Brahm K, et al; LOVIT II Study Group. Outcomes of the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial II (LOVIT II): A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(2):96-104. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4742
Massof RW. The Activity Inventory: An Adaptive Visual Function Questionnaire. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(8):763-77.
Lamoureux EL, Pallant JF, Pesudovs K, Rees G, Hassell JB, Keeffe JE. The effectiveness of low-vision rehabilitation on participation in daily living and quality of life. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(4):1476-82. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0610
Owsley C, McGwin G, Lee PP, Wasserman N, Searcey K. Characteristics of low-vision rehabilitation services in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(5):681-9. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.55
Prohrama rozvytku OON v Ukraini. Rehabilitation of people with visual impairments: analysis of the situation. Kyiv: UNDP; 2023. Available from: https://www.undp.org/uk/ukraine/publications/rehabilitation-people-visual-impairmentsanalysis-situation
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Pro reabilitatsiiu u sferi okhorony zdorovia: Zakon Ukrainy vid 03.12.2020 №1053-IX. Baza danykh «Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy». Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/1053-20 [in Ukrainian]
UNDP Ukraine. In Ukraine, visual disabilities rise sharply in wake of war: UNDP initiative supports Ukrainians with loss of sight. 2023. Available from: https://www.undp.org/ukraine/news/ukraine-visual-disabilities-rise-sharply-wake-war-undpinitiative-supports-ukrainians-overcome-challenges-associated-loss-sight
UNDP Ukraine. Rehabilitation of people with visual impairments: analysis of situation in Ukraine. Kyiv: UNDP; 2023. Available from: https://www.undp.org/ukraine/publications/rehabilitation-people-visual-impairments-analysis-situation
Cai C, Shuai Y, Li G. The effect of low vision rehabilitation on the quality of life and caregiver burden of low vision patients – a randomized trial. BMC Ophthalmol. 2025;25:20. doi:10.1186/s12886-025-03864-9
Liu J, Dong J, Chen Y, Zhang W, Tong S, Guo J. Low vision rehabilitation in improving the quality of life for patients with impaired vision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 52 randomized clinical trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(19):e25736. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000025736





