Sedation in dentistry and out-patient maxillofacial surgery. Theory and practice
Keywords:
sedation, psychoemotional comfort, discomfort, dentistry and maxillofacial surgery, anxiolysis, monitoring, propofol, midazolam, dexmedetomidine, safety, general anesthesiaAbstract
In recent decades, the use of medical procedural sedation in outpatient settings has gained considerable popularity due to the expansion of treatment options for the doctor and increased comfort for the patient. Moderate medical sedation allows patients to better tolerate medical and diagnostic manipulations, avoid operative stress and associated anxiety, fear and pain. This is of great importance to a wide range of patients. For example, patients with accompanying arterial hypertension, with heart rhythm disturbances and myocardial ischemia, provided that sedation is carried out during outpatient interventions, avoid the possibility of decompensation of cardiac pathology. For children, the elderly, or patients with special needs, any hospitalization associated with forced separation from family is associated with psychological trauma. Therefore, it is important to carry out medical and diagnostic procedures under sedation in outpatient settings that are small in terms of trauma and duration. The advantages of ambulatory anesthesiology include economic expediency, convenience for the patient, reduction of the risk of thrombotic complications and hospital infection, and increased efficiency of hospital beds. Modern anesthesiology has a rich arsenal of techniques and drugs for anesthetic support of outpatient operations, but the issues of finding the optimal scheme for sedation, assessing its adequacy, and means of monitoring the patient's condition remain relevant and require in-depth study. This review presents modern recommendations for procedural sedation in adults and children in outpatient settings. The definitions of sedation, psychoemotional comfort and discomfort are thoroughly described and introduced. A special emphasis is put on pathophysiology of psychoemotional discomfort and peri-operative stress. According to modern data, the objectives to be achieved by an anesthesiologist have been reviewed: provision of psychoemotional inhibition (as a basis of comfort staying in a dental chair), but not depression of consciousness as it used to be before. With much detail it analyzes complication occurring during anesthesia; their correlations with age. concurrent conditions, anesthetic agent and doctor’s professional level are highlighted. The article presents a clinical picture of sedation depending on the depression of consciousness, respiration, and hemodynamics (ADA and ASA, 2016). It depicts thoroughly the state of minimal sedation (anxiolysis), moderate sedation (awake sedation), deep sedation and general anesthesia. Special attention is paid to the provision of patient’s safety related to supporting airway patency and hemodynamics. The article presents methods of sedation from the position of modern global data and personal experience of authors. Methods to medication administration are mentioned: enteral, parenteral, including intra-nasal which is fairly popular of late. Special attention is paid to specific problems of sedation, presence of motion activity, psychoemotional agitation, compulsive coughing. Potential causes of these events are described, in particular, correlation between psychoemotional agitation with dysregulation of GABA-ergic and dopaminergic systems. Current data on the intra-operative monitoring are presented, as an important component of the patient’s safety during sedation. Additionally to Harvard Standard, it is recommended to use capnograpy and monitoring of sedation depth through bispectral index.
References
Бобринська ІГ, Сігасв ВВ. Основні етапи знеболювання у стоматології. Історія стоматології. I Всеросійська конференція (з міжнародною участю). Доповіді та тези. М. 2017.
Бобров А.П, Ревюк ВС. Актуальні проблеми знеболювання на практиці лікаря-стоматолога. Від витоків донині. Українська конференція (з міжнародним участю). Доповіді та тези. М. 2009.
Богданова ІВ. Роль дофаміну в механізмах формування деяких розладів ЦНС та станів залежності (огляд літератури) ІІ Український вісник психоневрології. Т. 19. № 67. 2011. С. 5-8.
Бузунов РВ, Царьова ЄВ. Синдром неспокійних ніг: Навчальний посібник для лікарів. Х. 2021. 27 с.
Бунятян АА. Посібник з анестезіології. М: Медицина. 2018. С. 168-185.
Бунятян АА, Мещеряков АВ, Цибуляк ВН. Атаралгезія. 2013. С. 170.
Бургонський ВГ. Сучасна технологія місцевого знеболювання у стоматології. Сучасна стоматологія. 2019. Т. 2. С.99-104.
Дубинін ВА. Регуляторні системи організму людини/Розділ 3. Загальна фізіологія нервової системи. М: Дрофа, 2018. С. 144-153.
Катуніна ЄА, Авакян ГН, Титова ВІ. Від створення до нових розробок. Журнал неврології та психіатрії. 2016. № 4. С. 97-103.
Самохвалов ВП. Психіатрія. Навчальний посібник студентам медичних вузів. Глава 8. Приватна психіатрія. Афективні розлади настрою (F3). С. 175-178.
Світлов ВА, Зайцев АС, Козлов СП. Психоемоційний комфорт – спеціальний компонент анестезії. Анестезіологія та реаніматологія. 2018. № 5. С. 88-91.
Світлов ВА, Зайцев АЮ, Козлов СП. Збалансована анестезія на основі регіонарних блокад: стратегія та тактика. Анестезіологія та реаніматологія. 2016. № 4. С. 4-12.
Agostoni М, Fanti L, Gemma М. et al. Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for G1 endoscopy: an 8-year experience. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2017. Vol. 74, № 2. P. 266-275.
Ahmed SS, Hicks S, Slaven JE. et al. Intermittent bolus versus continuous infusion of propofol for deep sedation during ABR/nuclear medicine studies // J. Pediatric Intens. Care. 2017. Vol. 6. № 3. P. 176-181.
American Dental Association. Guidelines for the use of sedation and general anesthesia by dentists, 2012. Available at: https://www.ada.org/-/media/ADA/Files/anesthesia_use_guidelines. ashx. Accessed May 10, 2016.
American Dental Association. Guidelines for the use of sedation and genera l anesthesia by dentists. Adopted by the ADA House of Delegates, October. 2016.
Anderson KJ, Kenny GN. Intravenous drugs for sedation: target-controlled, patient-controlled and patient-maintained delivery//Total Intraven. Anesthesia Target Controlled Infusions // Springer. 2017. P. 369-390.
Annequin D, Carbajal R, Chauvin P. et al. Fixed 50% nitrous oxide oxygen mixture for painful procedures: a French survey. Pediatrics. 2018. Vol. 105, No 4. P. 47-49
Anthonappa RR, Ashley PF, Bonetti DL. et al. Non-pharmacological interventions for managing dental anxiety in children. The Cochrane Library. 2017. URL:http://www.cochrane.org/CD012676/ORAL_non-pharmacologi cal-interventions-managingdental-anxiety-children.
Arpaci AH, Isik B. Pediatric tooth extractions under sedoanalgesia // Pakistan J. Med. Sci. 2016. Vol. 32, No 5. P. 1291.
Bennett JD, Kramer KJ, Bosack RC. How safe is deep sedation or general anesthesia while providing dental care // J. Am. Dental Association. 2019. Vol. 146. No 9. P. 705-708.
Bailey R, Pace NL, Ashburn MA. et al. Frequent hypoxemia and apnea after sedation with midazolam and fentanyl. Anesthesiology. 2017. Vol. 73, No 5. P. 826-830.
Chanavaz M, Ferri J, Donazzan M. Intravenous sedation in implantology. Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillafaciale. 2017. Vol. 98, № 1. P. 57-61.
Coté GA, Hovis RM, Ansstas MA. et al. Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures II Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatology. 2016. Vol. 8, № 2. P. 137-142.
Devasya A., Sarpangala M. Dexniedetomidine: a review of a newer sedative in dentistry. J. Clin. Ped. Dentistry. 2015. Vol. 39, N» 5. P. 401-409.
Esen E, Ustün Y, Balcioglu O. et al. Evaluation of patient-controlled remifentanil application in third molar surgery. J. Oral Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015. Vol. 63, N4. P. 457-463.
Faddy SC, Garlick SR. A systematic review of the safety of analgesia with 50% nitrous oxide: can lay responders use analgesic gases in the prehospital setting. Emergency Med. J. 2015. Vol. 22, N12. P. 901-908.
Fong CY, Kwan A. Patient-controlled sedation using remifentanil for third molar extraction. Anaest. Intens. Care. 2015. Vol. 33, № 1. P. 73.
Halai T, Naqvi A, Steel C. et al. Complications of conscious sedation: causes and management. Dental Update. 2017. Vol. 44, № 11. P. 1034-1040.
Hall DL, Weaver J, Ganzberg S. et al. Bispectral EEG index monitoring of high-dose nitrous oxide and low-dose sevoflurane sedation. Anest. Progress. 2017. Vol. 49, N2. P. 56.
Hanamoto H, Sugimura M, Morimoto Y. et al. Cough rellex under intravenous sedation during dental implant surgery is more frequent during procedures in the maxillary anterior region. J. Oral Maxillofacial Surgery. 2013. Vol. 71, №4. P. el58-el63.
Hinkelbein J, Lamperti M, et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology and European Board of Anaesthesiology guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in adults // Europ.). Anaesthesiology (E|A). 2018. Vol. 35, N 1. P. 6-24.
Іnverso G, Dodson TB, Gonzalez ML. et al. Complications of intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia for adolescent patients receiving third-molar extraction. J. Oral Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015. Vol. 73, № 9. P. 34.
Khan AB, Kingsley T, Caroline P. Sublingual Tablets and the Benefits of the Sublingual Route of Administration. J. Pharmaceutical Research. 2017. Vol. 16, № 3. P. 257-267.
Kim SO, Kim YJ, Hyun H. K. et al Deep sedation with sevoflurane inhalation via a nasal hood for brief dental procedures in pediatric patients II Pediatr. Emergency Care. 2016. Vol. 29, N8. P. 926-928.
Kohjitani A, Egusa M, Shimada M. et al. Accumulated oropharyngeal water increases coughing during dental treatment with intravenous sedation II). Oral Rehabilitation. 2018. Vol. 35, № 3. P. 203-208.
Lee HH, Milgrom P, Starks H. et al. Trends in death associated with pediatric dental sedation and general anesthesia. Pediatr. Anesthesia. 2013. -Vol. 23, N8. P.741-746.
Luhmann J. D., Kennedy R. M., Porter F. L. et al. A randomized clinical trial of continuous-flow nitrous oxide and midazolam for sedation of young children during laceration repair // Ann. Emergency Med. 2011. Vol. 37, № 1. P. 20-27.
Miller RD, Pardo M. Basics of Anesthesia E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2011. P. 3-11.
Messieha ZS, Ananda RC, Hoffman WE. et al Bispectral Index System (BIS) monitoring reduces time to discharge in children requiring intramuscular sedation and general anesthesia for outpatient dental rehabilitation. Pediatric Dentistry. 2014. Vol. 26, № 3. P. 256-260.
O’Halloran M. The use of anaesthetic agents to provide anxiolysis and sedation in dentistry and oral surgery. Austral. Med. J. 2013. Vol. 6, № 12. P. 713.
Powers KS, Nazarian EB, Tapyrik SA, et al. Bispectral index as a guide for titration of propofol during procedural sedation among children II Pediatrics. 2015. Vol. 115. № 6. P. 1666-1674.
Reuter NG. Death related to dental treatment: a systematic review // Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2017. Vol. 123, № 2. P. 194-204.
Roelofse JA, Shipton EA. Intranasal sufentanil/midazolam versus ketamine/midazolam for analgesia/sedation in the pediatric population prior to undergoing multiple dental extractions under general anesthesia: a prospective, double-blind, randomized comparison. Anesthesia Progress. 2014. Vol. 51. № 4. P. 114.
Symington L, Thakore S. A review of the use of propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. J. 2016. Vol. 23, № 2. – P. 89-93.
Torun AC, Yilmaz MZ, Ozkan N. Sedative-analgesic activity of remifentanil and effects of preoperative anxiety on perceived pain in outpatient mandibular third molar surgery. Intern. J. Oral Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017. Vol. 46, No 3. P. 379-384.
Woolley SM, Chadwick B, Pugsley L. The interpersonal work of dental conscious sedation: A qualitative analysis. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2017. Vol. 45. N 4. P. 330-336.