Evaluation of results and complications of primary surgical correction of aesthetic deformities of the nose

Authors

  • Vasyl Vasylovych Olashyn Danylo Halytsky Lviv Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8127.2023.68.16

Keywords:

nose deformity, rhinoplasty, complications, Pollybeak deformity, tip nose deformity, treatment, prevention

Abstract

Introduction. Rhinoplasty is one of the most technically complex operations of all surgical interventions on the face, especially given the numerous complications that can occur both in the early and late postoperative period. About 5–15% of patients undergoing rhinoplasty subsequently undergo revision surgery. The study and in-depth scientific analysis of complications and consequences associated with rhinoplasty is an urgent task of plastic surgery, which is important for their prevention, choosing the right tactics to reduce their frequency, and optimizing the elimination of defects in case of their occurrence. Aim of the study: to determine the most characteristic and weighty complications of rhinoplasty in a cosmetic sense, the possibilities and perspectives of their operative correction and preventive measures. Methodology and methods: We have analyzed the results of the treatment of 68 patients operated on in the surgical department of the Lviv municipal cosmetology hospital between 2016 and 2019, who underwent primary rhinoplasty for similar aesthetic deformities of the nose. For this reason, the age of the patients was from 18 to 48 years. Esthetic complaints concerned the outer appearance, and esthetic discomfort from perception of one’s face and appearance. Functional complaints were presented by 63 patients (92.6%). Esthetic assessment of the face and the surgeon’s esthetic vision and feeling of proportions were reflected using VPPS (Virtual Plastic Surgery Software) or Adobe Photoshop. Subsequently, photography and filming were performed 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. In all cases, rhinoplasty was conducted under general anesthesia combined with controlled hypotension and topical anesthesia. In all cases, marginal surgical access was utilized, along the caudal margin of the major alar cartilage. In open rhinoplasty cases this was combined with transcolumellar access. Upon access, soft tissues were separated from cartilage and bones of the nose en bloc, thus ensuring good visibility of all structures of the tip and the dorsum of the nose. In all cases, resection and osteotomy was utilized to decrease the projection and the width of the nose. Modification of the cartilaginous dorsum of the nose and shaping of the tip were achieved by conservative suturing techniques combined with resection, as required to decrease the projection and the length of the cartilage. Once the bony and cartilaginous framework was created, access was closed with sutures. In all cases, a thermoplastic external fixation bandage was applied for 7 days, along with intranasal splints and Merocel dressing. Final assessment of rhinoplasty outcomes was done during follow-up visits one year after surgery. Results and discussion: In 2 cases, i.e. 1.4%, nasal bony callus was observed. In one case, i.e. 0.7%, primary rhinoplasty was complicated with V-shaped deformity. Pollybeak deformity was observed in 14 cases, i.e. 20.6%. Of these, in 11 cases (16.2%), mild Pollybeak deformity was observed, which required brief conservative treatment. The remaining 3 patients (4.4%) developed a moderate or severe deformity required long-term medical treatment in 2 cases, and surgery combined with medical treatment in one cases. It has been shown in a study, that the most frequent esthetic complication of primary rhinoplasty, requiring long-term medical treatment and, in some cases, surgery, was Pollybeak deformation of nose. The incidence of this complication in our study was 20.6%, as opposer to 5 to 39% in other studies, indicates that this problem is relevant and requires deeper investigation. Conclusions. 1. Rhinoplasty is a complex surgery that must be performed by highly specialized experts. 2. Considering the complexity of rhinoplasty and the large number of various techniques and combinations of techniques, as well as variable anatomy of the nose and nasal structures, the risk and percentage of complications is high. 3. Pollybeak deformity is the most frequent complication after primary rhinoplasty. 4. Pollybeak deformity as a complication of primary rhinoplasty requires deeper study and analysis in order to eliminate its causes and develop prevention strategies to decrease the incidence of this complication.

References

Sharif-Askary B, Carlson AR, Van Noord MG, Marcus J. Incidence of Postoperative Adverse Events after Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Mar;145(3):669-84 DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006561

Eytan DF, Wang TD. Complications in Rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 2022 Jan;49(1):179-89 DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2021.07.009

Rezaei F, Rezaei F, Abbasi H, Moradi H. A Comparison of Doctor/Patient Satisfaction with Aesthetic Outcomes of Rhinoplasty: a Prospective Study. J Med Life. 2019 Oct-Dec;12(4):374-80 DOI: 10.25122/jml-2019-0061

Gadkaree SK, Weitzman RE, Fuller JC, Justicz N, Gliklich RE. Review of literature of saddle nose deformity reconstruction and presentation of vomer onlay graft. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020;5(6):1039-43 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.475. eCollection 2020 Dec

Vian HNK, Berger CAS, Barra DC, Perin AP. Revision rhinoplasty: physician-patient aesthetic and functional evaluation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Nov-Dec;84(6):736-43 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.08.011

Sandel HD. Polly Beak Deformity in Rhinoplasty. Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery [Internet]. 2021 Dec 02 [cited May 11]. Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/841075-overview#a12

Bouaoud J, Loustau M, Belloc JB. Functional and Aesthetic Factors Associated with Revision of Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Sep 5;6(9):e1884 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001884. eCollection 2018 Sep.

Fichman M, Piedra Buena IT. Rhinoplasty. Stat Pearls Publishing [Internet]. 2023 Jan [cited 2023 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558970/

Ferreira MG, Santos M. Preservation Rhinoplasty in the Saddle Nose: The Reverse Spare Roof Technique. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2022 May-Jun;24(3):168-70 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0036

Fakih-Gomez N, Marin-Mendez HM, Mungo-Quezada G, Abrego-Mendez EM, Caballero-Rodriguez A, Castro-Carrasco F, et al. A New Technique for Correction of Fibrous Pollybeak Deformity Using a Rotational V-Shaped Flap in Secondary Rhinoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol [Internet]. 2022 July14 [cited 2023 Mar 19]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/07488068221103074

Baiaji N. Textbook of nasal tip rhinoplasty. Open surgical techniques. Springer Nature Switzerland AG [Internet]; 2020. 393 p. [cited 2023 Mar 21]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bfm:978-3-030-48157-5/1?pdf=chapter%20toc DOI.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48157-5

Published

2023-10-09

How to Cite

Олашин, В. В. (2023). Evaluation of results and complications of primary surgical correction of aesthetic deformities of the nose. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod University. Series «Medicine», (2(68), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8127.2023.68.16

Issue

Section

GENERAL SURGERY (ALL SURGICAL DISCIPLINES)