The standardisation of applying minimally invasive methods in treatment of post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy bile leakage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24144/2415-8127.2018.58.73-76Keywords:
cholelithiasis, laparoscopiccholecystectomy, bileleakage, surgicaltactics, relaparoscopy.Abstract
Introduction. The paper analyses the results of surgical treatment of 10758 patients with cholelithiasis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In the early postoperative period 63 patients (0.59%) had bile leakage. Materials and methods. There were 21 (33.3%) patients with a diagnosis of chronic cholecystitis and 42 (62,7%) patients with acute cholecystitis. In 53 (84.1%) cases there was a drainage bile leakage, in 10 (15.9%) cases bile leakage was diagnosed after the drainages were removed. In 22 (34.9%) cases daily volume of bile was 150-200 ml, in these cases patients underwent active aspiration, antibacterial and deintoxicating therapy. In case of drainage leakage was more than 200 ml 2-3 days after operation, 23 (36.5%) patients underwent biliary system decompression through endoscopic papillotomy or conducting nasobiliary drainage. In 10 cases EPST with nasobiliary drainage was effective and bile leakage was eliminated in 5 to 8 days. If ERCP and EPST weren’t effective, stomach pain remained or grew even stronger and there were intoxication and peritoneal symptoms, 13 (20.6%) patients had undergone relaparoscopy. Results. Developed surgical technique is based on ultrasound data and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and is able to improve the results of treatment and avoid septic complications and lethal outcomes. Conservative treatment, minimally invasive endoscopic techniques, ultrasound guided puncture methods and relaparoscopy were effective in 55 patients (87.3%). Conclusion. The standardization of complex relaparoscopy application, transduodenal endoscopic interventions and paracentesis techniques allows to decrease essentially a number of laparotomic operation
References
Hrubnyk VV, Tkachenko AI, Prykupenko MV, Vorotyntseva KO. Nestandartnie operatsii pri tehnicheski slozhnih holetsistektomiyah [Nonstandard laparoscopic surgeries at technically difficult cholecystectomy]. Hospital surgery, 2013;1(61):32-35.[In Russian].
Fu CY, Hsieh CH, Shih CH, Wang YC, Chen RJ, Huang HC, et al. The effects of repeat laparoscopic surgery on the treatment of complications resulting from laparoscopic surgery. Am Surg. 2012;78(9):926-32.
Abu Shamsieh RN. Endovideohirurgiya v lecheniiposleoperacionnihvnutribryushnihoslozhnenii [Endovideosurgery in treatment of postoperative intraperitoneum complications] Surgery of Ukraine, 2012:42(4):93-9.[In Russian].
Ljubičić N, Bišćanin A, Pavić T, Nikolić M, Budimir I, Mijić A, et al. Biliary leakage after urgent cholecys:- ectomy: Optimization of endoscopic treatment. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Internet]. 2015;7(5):547. Available from: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i5/547-T1.htm DOI 10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.547
Iimuro Y, Okada T, Ohashi K, Uda Y, Suzumura K, Fujimoto J. Salvage treatment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy- associated bile duct stenosis combining laparoscopic and endoscopic procedures: A case report. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery [Internet]. 2013;6(4):322-326. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24308595 DOI 10.1111/ases.12053
Canena J, Horta D, Coimbra J, Meireles L, Russo P, Marques I, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic management of primary and refractory postcholecystectomy biliary leaks in a multicentre review of 178 patients. BMC Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2015;15(1). Available from: https://bmcgastroenterol.biomedcentral.com/articles/ 10.1186/s12876-015-0334-y DOI 10.1186/s12876-015-0334-y
Yılmaz E, Bulakçı M. Diagnosing the duct of Luschka injury at magnetic resonance imaging with hepatospecific contrast agents after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pamukkale Medical Journal. 2017;10(1):77-80. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317382425_Diagnosing_the_duct_of_Luschka_injury _at_magnetic_resonance_imaging_with_hepatospecific_contrast_agents_after_laparoscopic_cholecystectomy DOI 10.5505/ptd.2016.63626
LoNigro C, Geraci G, Dciuto A, et al. Bile leak safter videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy: duct of Luschka. Endoscopic treatment in a single center and brief literature review on current managment. AnnItalChir. 2012;4(83):303-12.
Masuda Y, Mizuguchi Y, Kanda T, Furuki H, Mamada Y, Taniai N, et al. Successful treatment of limy bile syndrome extending to the common bile duct by laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration: A case report and literature review. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery [Internet]. 2016;10(1):59-62. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ases.12317 DOI 10.1111/ases.12317
Mehmedovic Z, Mehmedovic M, Hasanovic J. A Rare Case of Biliary Leakage After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy- Diagnostic Evaluation and Nonsurgical Treatment: a Case Report. Acta Informatica Medica [Internet]. 2015;23(2):116. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26005280 DOI 10.5455/aim.2015.23.116-119
Kim H. Endoscopic intervention for persistent bile leakage after cholecystectomy. Gastrointestinal Intervention [Internet]. 2016;5(3):224-225. Available from: https://www.koreamed.org/SearchBasic.php?RID= 0238GII% 2F2016.5.3.224&DT=1 DOI 10.18528/gii160021
Brady P, Taunk P. Endoscopic Treatment of Biliary Leaks After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Cut or Plug?. Digestive Diseases and Sciences [Internet]. 2017;63(2):273-274. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29243103 DOI 10.1007/s10620-017-4852-z
Rustagi T, Aslanian H. Endoscopic Management of Biliary Leaks After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2014;48(8):674-678. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24296422 DOI 10.1097/mcg.0000000000000044 14. Doumenc B, Boutros M, Dégremont R, Bouras A. Biliary leakage from gallbladder bed after cholecystectomy: Luschka duct or hepaticocholecystic duct?. Morphologie [Internet]. 2016;100(328):36-40. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26404734 DOI 10.1016/j.morpho.2015.08.003