Results of in-patient surgical management of auricular conchal esthetic defects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8127.2023.68.20Keywords:
prominent ears, otoplasty, postoperative complications, ligature fistula, recurrenceAbstract
We have analysed 127 congenital auricular conchal deformity cases treated at Lviv Municipal Cosmetology Hospital between 2016 and 2019, aiming to identify the spectrum and nature of postoperative complications, as well as the scope of surgical correction and preventive strategies. Age of patients varied between 7 and 54 years (mean- 25,7 ± 2,4 ), with almost 3 times more females than males, 93 versus 34. The patients primarily complained about unilateral or bilateral prominent ear deformities. Patients were assessed by A.T.Hruzdyeva score and metric characterization of the deformity. Enlarged height of cup with well-developed antihelix and its pedicle and scapho-conchal angle increased to 170 degrees was noted in 7 cases. Increased height of cup associated with poorly developed antihelix and its pedicle was noted in 69 cases. Unilateral prominent concha was noted in 12 cases. All patients were photographed preoperatively and 2-3 months and 1 years postoperatively. The following standard of photography was followed consistently: a) frontal view of head, scale 1:7, camera to patient distance 120 cm, b) posterior view of head, scale 1:7, camera to patient distance 120 cm, c) lateral close view of the ear concha, scale 1:2, camera to patient distance 40 cm. Both right and left ears were photographed. In 73 cases (57,5%), J. Mustarde otoplasty was performed with antihelix and its pedicles made more prominent by separate sutures without releasing the ear cartilage. In 38 cases, N. Bulstrode technique was utilized, with releasing the anti-helical cartilage on the other side. Out of 92 cases with tall cup, in 19 cases (14,9%) D. Furnas suture technique was utilized, in 18 cases (14,2%) tall cup was reduced according to E. Eitner technique, in 38 cases (29,9%), J. Davis lowering otoplasty was performed, and in 17 cases (13,4%) the tall cup was reduced from anterior access according to B. Bauer technique. Hemorrhage and hematoma formation were uncommon in the early postoperative period, with only 2 cases (1,6%) registered. In one case, superior auricular artery was the source of bleeding. In the other case, it was cutaneous vessels in the retroauricular access margin. Skin necrosis and pressure injuries were noted in 4 cases (3,2%), leading to superficial epidermolysis mostly along the anterior conchal surface, but occasionally affecting the posterior surface as well. In one case (0,8%) traces of the diamond green dye used intraoperatively were noticeable in soft tissues of the ear. In 1 adolescent patient, Dumbbell keloid was noted. In 8 cases, retroauricular fistulae from ligatures developed. In 14 cases, recurrence of prominent earcups was observed. Corrective surgery mostly implied the N. Bulstrode technique. Conclusions. 1. Surgical management of esthetic auricular conchal defects is a complex type of plastic and esthetic surgery and thus should be performed by specialized in-patient clinics. 2. Main early postoperative complications of otoplasty include bleeding and hematoma, skin necrosis and pressure lesions, visible contours and protrusion of sutures under thin covering tissues. 3. Key long-term complications of otoplasty include recurrence of prominent earcups and ligature fistulas, causes and mechanisms of which must be studied in-depth in terms of prevention and management.
References
Avetykov DS, Steblovskyi DV. Vdoskonalennia kosmetychnoi otoplastyky z urakhuvanniam biomekhaniky shkiry. Aktualni problemy suchasnoi medytsyny. 2015; 15 (3, ч. 1): 9–14.
Avetikov DS, Stavytskyi SO, Lokes KP, Yatsenko IV. Dyferentsiina diahnostyka normotrofichnykh ta patolohichnykh rubtsiv holovy ta shyi. Svit biolohii ta medytsyny. 2013; (1): 87–91.
Avetikov DS, Stavytskyi SO. Kliniko-henetychne ta morfolohichne obgruntuvannia profilaktyky utvorennia pisliaoperatsiinykh patolohichnykh rubtsiv holovy ta shyi: monohrafiia. Poltava; 2013. 94 с.
Kurbanov UA, Davlatov AA, Dzhanobylova SM, Kholov ShY, Dadodzhonov DzhIu, Kurbanov ZA. Novыi sposob rekonstruktsyy nyzhneho poliusa ushnoi rakovynы. Vestnyk Avytsennы. 2016; (2): 32–6.
Pynchuk VD. Эstetycheskaia khyrurhyia lytsa y shey. K.: Yzd-vo «KYT»; 2019. 416 с.
Fistal EIa, Mishalov VH, Samoilenko HIe. Plastychna khirurhiia. K.: VSV «Medytsyna»; 2010. 376 с.
Chkadua TZ, Nadtochyi AH, Asyrova HV, Chernenkyi MM, Frolov SS, Davыdenko PY. Rekonstruktyvnaia otoplastyka: pretsyzyonnoe vyrtualnoe modelyrovanye autorebernoho khriashchevoho karkasa ushnoi rakovynы. Rossyiskyi stomatolohycheskyi zhurnal. 2017; 21(1): 36–8.
AlAwadh I, Alassiry H, Bogari A, Alabduljabbar Z, AlDosari B. Complication Rates From Otoplasty at a Tertiary Facial Plastic Surgery Center: A Retrospective Analysis. J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Sep 1;33(6):1813-5 doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008455
Assis MS, Miranda LS. Performance-optimized otoplasty. BMC Surg. 2022 May 14;22(1):182 doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01587-y. 8
Aysel A, Karatan B, Ergün U, Müderris T. Modified bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap for prominent ear correction. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jan-Feb;89(1):152-8 doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.01.008
Benkler M, Weiss N, Egozi D, Dolgunin L, Kouniavski E. Cartilage-Sparing Otoplasty – A New Approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Mar 14 doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010401
Boroditsky ML, Van Slyke AC, Arneja JS. Outcomes and Complications of the Mustardé Otoplasty: A "Good-Fast-Cheap" Technique for the Prominent Ear Deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Sep 24;8(9):e3103 doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003103. eCollection 2020
Edafe O, Argyriou K, Thevasagayam MS. Outcomes and complications of incisionless otoplasty – A retrospective observational study and a review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;137:110246 doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110246.
Gelidan AG, Mortada H, Alarki SMKZ, Arab K, Kattan AE. A Novel Otoplasty Technique Using Dermabrader on Prominent Ear Deformity Patients: A Retrospective Study and a Description of Technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jan 27;11(1):e4786 doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004786
Iqbal FM, Hussain T, Afzal Y, Beg MSA. Our Experience With the Correction of Prominent Ear Deformity. Cureus. 2021 Nov 20;13(11):e19772 doi: 10.7759/cureus.19772. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Kühn S, Wöhler N, Wehle A, Küenzlen L, Rothenberger J, Sader R, Lemperle G, Rieger UM. Otoplasty through Ventral Skin Incision and Shaping of the Antihelix by Abrasion-A Retrospective Study. J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 20;10(16):3713 doi: 10.3390/jcm10163713
McGarry KM, Khadim MF, McBride M, Martin S, Moorehead A, Rashid A, Hill C, Fogarty B. Otoplasty: The Belfast Experience. A 10-Year Review of 2333 Ear Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Mar 1;151(3):388e-397e doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009908
Mehmet GM, Baklaci D. Correction of Prominent Ears: Postauricular Muscle Relocation and Fibrofatty Tissue Excision. J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Sep 1;32(6):e530-e533 doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007480
Teaima AA, Hasaballah MS, Mady OM. Minimally Invasive Technique for Correction of Prominent Ear. J Int Adv Otol. 2020 Aug;16(2):259-62 doi: 10.5152/iao.2020.7942
Wang Q, Wang Y, Wang M, Li Q, Zhang Q, Zhou X. A modified crescent cartilage block for improving the retroauricular contour of the reconstructed ear: A retrospective cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Jun;74(6):1324-30 doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.021
Zanin EM, Maximiliano J, Oliveira ACP, Arpini NE, Duarte DW, Portinho CP, Collares MVM. . Otoplasty: Rasps or Puncture Needles? A Clinical Trial. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Apr;45(2):521-527 doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01972-z